Showing posts with label war. Show all posts
Showing posts with label war. Show all posts


TRIPOLI: Western powers launched a second wave of air strikes on Libya early on Monday after halting the advance of Muammar Qaddafi’s forces on Benghazi and targeting air defences to let their planes patrol the skies.

The UN-mandated intervention to protect civilians caught up in a one-month-old revolt against Qaddafi drew criticism from Arab League chief Amr Moussa, who questioned the need for a heavy bombardment, which he said had killed many civilians.

But the United States, carrying out the air strikes in a coalition with Britain, France, Italy and Canada among others, said the campaign was working and dismissed a ceasefire announcement by the Libyan military on Sunday evening.

Britain’s Defence Ministry said one of its submarines had again fired Tomahawk guided missiles on Sunday night as part of a second wave of attacks to enforce the UN resolution.

“We and our international partners are continuing operations in support of the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973,” a ministry spokesman said.

Italy said it also had warplanes in the air, after US and British warships and submarines launched 110 Tomahawk missiles on Saturday night and Sunday morning.

Vice Admiral Bill Gortney, director of the US military’s Joint Staff, told reporters there had been no new Libyan air activity or radar emissions, but a significant decrease in Libyan air surveillance, since strikes began Saturday.

Benghazi was not yet free from threat, said Gortney, but Qaddafi’s forces in the area were in distress and “suffering from isolation and confusion” after the air assaults.

Late on Sunday night, Libyan officials took Western reporters to Qaddafi’s compound in Tripoli, a sprawling complex that houses his private quarters as well as military barracks, anti-aircraft batteries and other installations, to see what they said was the site of a missile attack two hours earlier.

“It was a barbaric bombing,” said government spokesman Mussa Ibrahim, showing pieces of shrapnel that he said came from the missile. “This contradicts American and Western (statements) that it is not their target to attack this place.”

A Libyan military spokesman announced a new ceasefire on Sunday, saying that “the Libyan armed forces have issued a command to all military units to safeguard an immediate ceasefire from 9 pm this evening”.

Both before and after he spoke, heavy anti-aircraft gunfire boomed above central Tripoli.

Outside Benghazi, smouldering, shattered tanks and troop carriers from what had been Qaddafi’s advancing forces littered the main road. The charred bodies of at least 14 government soldiers lay scattered in the desert.

But with Qaddafi having vowed to fight to the death, there were fears his troops might try to force their way into cities, seeking shelter from air attacks among the civilian population.

In central Benghazi, sporadic explosions and heavy exchanges of gunfire could be heard in the streets late on Sunday evening.

A Reuters witness said the firing lasted about 40 minutes.

In Misrata, the last rebel-held city in western Libya, government tanks moved in after a base used by Gaddafi’s forces outside was hit by air strikes on Saturday, residents said.

“There is fighting between the rebels and Qaddafi’s forces. Their tanks are in the centre of Misrata. There are so many casualties we cannot count them,” Abdelbasset, a spokesman for the rebels in Misrata, told Reuters on Sunday afternoon.

Civilian Casualties

A Libyan government health official said 64 people had been killed by Western bombardment on Saturday and Sunday morning, but it was impossible to independently verify the report.

Libyan state television showed footage from an unidentified hospital of what it called victims of the “colonial enemy”. Ten bodies were wrapped in white and blue bed sheets, and several people were wounded, one of them badly, the television said.

Arab League Secretary-General Amr Moussa called for an emergency meeting of the group’s 22 states to discuss Libya. He requested a report on the bombardment, which he said had “led to the deaths and injuries of many Libyan civilians”.

“What is happening in Libya differs from the aim of imposing a no-fly zone, and what we want is the protection of civilians and not the bombardment of more civilians,” Egypt’s state news agency quoted him as saying.

There was no immediate public backing for his call from any government in the region, however.

Arab support for a no-fly zone provided crucial underpinning for the passage of a UN Security Council resolution last week that paved the way for Western action to stop Qaddafi killing civilians as he fights an uprising against his 41-year rule.

US President Barack Obama spoke to Jordan’s King Abdullah, while Vice President Joe Biden phoned leaders in Algeria and Kuwait to shore up Arab support.

The intervention is the biggest against an Arab country since the 2003 invasion of Iraq.


Continue.....

COLOMBO: A host of international figures, including a US war crimes investigator, landed in Sri Lanka on Tuesday for visits expected to focus on alleged atrocities committed during the country’s civil war. As the separate US, Japanese and United Nations officials arrived in Colombo, the government furiously denied that any war crimes were committed during the final months of fighting last year. The US embassy in Colombo said the two advisors had been sent by President Barack Obama to discuss issues including the military offensive that ended the decades-long war with separatist Tamil rebels in May 2009. Samantha Power, special assistant to the president on multilateral affairs and human rights, and David Pressman, national security council director for war crimes and atrocities, will hold four days of meetings in Sri Lanka. The embassy said the visit followed last month’s meeting in Washington between US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Sri Lanka’s External Affairs Minister G L Peiris. The US has been pressing for an independent war crimes investigation into the final phase of fighting that ended with the Tamil Tigers’ defeat. Sri Lanka this week is also hosting two other international envoys to discuss peace and reconciliation and alleged human rights abuses during the war. UN chief Ban Ki-moon’s top political adviser, Lynn Pascoe, and Japan’s special envoy to Sri Lanka, Yasushi Akashi, were due on Tuesday for talks with Sri Lankan officials. Defence Secretary Gotabhaya Rajapakse said those making war crimes allegations had failed to prove their claims. “I challenge them to produce evidence,” he told the Sinhalese-language Lankadeepa newspaper. “There is no point in giving photographs and videos to the media. We have an established legal system. Use it.” Sri Lanka has denied any civilians were killed during the final offensive against the rebels last year, although the United Nations reported that at least 7,000 Tamil civilians perished in 2009. Both Pascoe and Akashi are expected to push Sri Lanka to improve ethnic reconciliation a year after the defeat of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) guerrillas, who were fighting for a Tamil homeland. Ban is due to appoint a panel on Sri Lanka following widespread allegations that both sides in the war were responsible for crimes against humanity. The top Sri Lankan army commander at the time, General Sarath Fonseka, has denied any wrongdoing, but has agreed to testify before any war crimes tribunal. Fonseka fell out with the government and quit in November before unsuccessfully challenging President Mahinda Rajapakse’s re-election at January polls.


Nine years on into the occupation of Afghanistan, Americans have finally understood that it will be far more difficult to withdraw than it was to go in.


On March 8, 1965, when the US Marines landed on the beaches of Da Nang in South Vietnam, history was poised to repeat itself as the Americans were poised to repeat the mistakes made by the French in 1946 when they returned to colonise Indo-China.


The marines had come with the belief that the ‘racially inferior gooks’ would not stand up to America’s military forces and that they would be home in time for Christmas. The American arrogance had percolated through their military’s rank and file. They soon discovered that their belief was entirely misplaced. The Vietnamese fighters not only stood up to them, but also turned them into psychopaths. Ten years later, when they could take it no more, the Americans withdrew in panic defeated, disgraced and traumatised. During the war they dropped 7.8 million tons of bombs of all kinds against 2.06 million tons dropped in the Second World War, and sprayed 75 million litres of defoliants including Dioxin over the fields, forests and villages of Vietnam, causing seven million casualties including three million dead, for the loss of 58,000 American servicemen. Their arrogance was buried in the jungles of South Vietnam, until it was resurrected 26 years later. History is now repeating itself in Afghanistan because the Americans repeated the mistake made by the Soviets. They are being made to pay for their folly of overestimating themselves and underestimating the skill and fortitude of the Afghan guerillas. Nine years on they have learned that it is far more difficult to withdraw than it was to go in. As a consequence, they have put in place a new strategy which seeks to create an environment that would allow them to commence the process of withdrawing the International Security Assistance Force (Isaf) from Afghanistan in July 2011. To create this environment they would apply such force on the Taliban as would compel them to sue for peace, while at the same time enticing the Taliban rank and file into desertion; then negotiate from a position of strength, transfer security responsibilities to the Afghan army, and commence the withdrawal process. If the strategy succeeds President Obama would be hailed as the victor in Afghanistan and his party would not only sweep the November elections to the Congress, but also the presidential elections in 2012. But if it fails, their arrogance would once again be buried, this time in the valley of death that south Afghanistan is for invaders. Why was the need felt for a new strategy? In a war against insurgency unless the mission is accomplished within a year, the war tends to drag on for years on end. In the event, the soldiers who are basically groomed for conventional war lose their combat effectiveness, having to fight an invisible enemy who is here, there and everywhere, yet nowhere. The guerillas have no such compulsion as time is always on their side. Therefore, they do everything to prolong the war in order to not only cultivate more recruits, build their inventory of weapons, ammunition and explosives, put in place an effective intelligence network, but also to play with the minds of the soldiers, for once the mind is defeated, the war is won. Therefore, it follows that if a half-hearted effort is applied against insurgency, it is bound to fail. The first mistake made by the Americans was to defy history. But having chosen to do so they should have assigned the resources needed to accomplish the mission. Thus, their main effort should have been in Afghanistan, not Iraq. Their second mistake was to initiate the air-bombing campaign without securing the crossing sites on their side of the Durand Line to prevent the Taliban and Al Qaeda operatives from escaping to the tribal areas of Pakistan — they thought that the Taliban would give battle in which they would be wiped out. But the Taliban were wiser. Even today, despite the deployment of substantial Pakistani effort along the Durand Line, a complementary effort by the Isaf is missing on their side of the Line. Their third mistake was not to end the Taliban domination of the mountains in which they have their safe havens. Yet instead of taking corrective action they persisted with the mismatch between the mission assigned and resources given. Consequently they suffered operational setbacks and blamed Pakistan for them. The additional US forces sanctioned are still not enough to accomplish the mission. However the least that can be done is to employ the available forces judiciously — one, for blocking at least those crossing sites which are used by the Haqqani group to make forays into Afghanistan from North Waziristan, and two, for ending the domination of the mountains by the Taliban. But they are fixated on Kandahar and North Waziristan. They want the Pakistan Army to take control of North Waziristan before the start of the Isaf operation against Kandahar planned for August 2010, even if that involves uncovering the eastern front which they mistakenly believe India would not exploit. The Pakistan Army formations presently engaged in holding the captured areas in Swat and Fata cannot be pulled out for an operation against North Waziristan, for doing so would create a weakness in these areas which the TTP would be quick to exploit. Therefore a new force would have to be assembled by denuding the eastern front even more, a situation that should not be acceptable to the high command. Instead, apart from their ongoing commitments in Fata, they should plan on eliminating the religious militant groups who are capable of orchestrating strikes beyond the borders of Pakistan. Hillary Clinton’s outburst is reminiscent of the arrogant ‘stone age’ call after 9/11. On reflection she just might have discovered that Pakistan has lost more soldiers than the combined losses suffered by foreign forces in Iraq and Afghanistan, and five times more civilians than those lost in the 9/11 strikes, which eminently reflect on Pakistan’s commitment to the war on terror. What ‘serious consequences’ is she threatening with? Choking the country economically, drone attacks across the country, invasion of Fata, seizure of nuclear storage sites by special operations forces or an air blitz against these sites and allied facilities, perhaps even carrying out the ‘stone age’ threat? Instead of living in mortal fear, the Americans should shed the paranoia that has gripped them and the arrogance that characterises their conduct with weaker states, and show some grace, serenity of mind and understanding and receptiveness to Pakistan’s concerns and constraints. Their uncalled for outbursts against a ‘partner’ would only serve to alienate the Pakistani people even more.

Powered by Blogger.

About Me

My Photo
News
+923146016065
View my complete profile

News


Wait upto 1 minute to Watch Dunya News Live

Tilawat Quran With Urdu

Followers

Website counter

Google Map

Allah Hoo

HOLY MYSTERIES, The Golden Ratio: 1.618 & Islam

Firoun's Body

Search

free counters